Agent workflows
We document the loops your team will use for code generation, refactoring, review, testing, and documentation. For each loop, we name its owner and define the input contract and exit criterion.
AI coding adoption with Claude Code and agent workflows.
We help a team already using Claude Code or Cursor define its agent workflows, review process, evaluation suites, and internal playbook. The team gets a repeatable process with an audit trail, ready for wider use.
Starts from EUR 10k. Four to six weeks, plus an optional retainer.
When at least three apply, your team is ready to formalize its AI engineering practice.
We document the loops your team will use for code generation, refactoring, review, testing, and documentation. For each loop, we name its owner and define the input contract and exit criterion.
The review rubric separates the checks an engineer performs from the rules enforced by the runtime. It also defines when to escalate an issue. Every review remains assigned to an accountable engineer.
A lightweight test suite shows when an agent starts to regress. Its scope stays practical enough for the team to run every week.
Your engineering lead owns a written playbook that records the practice. New engineers can learn it in hours, and the document is available to the whole team.
We observe the team at work and separate established habits from improvisation. We then choose the three workflows worth documenting with your team.
We write each workflow with the team, including its owner, input contract, and exit criterion. This turns existing habits into an explicit process.
We design the review rubric and evaluation suite around the team's normal work, with a scope they can maintain.
We use the new practice on active work for a week, then revise and document it with the team.
The engineering lead receives the internal playbook. The optional retainer provides monthly office hours to review the practice and adjust it as the tools or team change.
You own the workflows, review rituals, evaluation suite, and playbook. They remain usable if you stop working with us or change tools.
If you continue, the team uses the practice with EHOS, which records governance and audit information for every AI-generated change. Each change arrives ready for review, while the technical owner remains accountable.
A useful practice belongs to your team and lasts beyond the tool that introduced it.
EmpoweredHouse / AI Engineering Practice
The final price depends on team size, whether the work spans one repository or several, and whether compliance review sits on the critical path. The optional retainer is priced separately. Most teams use it during the first quarter.
How many engineers the practice must reach.
One repo or many.
Whether compliance is on the critical path.
During the fit call, we quote the engagement and check the team's readiness. Teams without working AI workflows receive a recommendation for an earlier engagement.
The fit call takes thirty minutes. We examine how your team ships with AI, why it chose that approach, and which parts are repeatable. We then recommend this practice engagement or an earlier service.